<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Upholds Tax Penalty for 2011-12, Overturns 2015-16 Penalty Citing Precedent and Appellant&#039;s Circumstances.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75832</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure to file the Return of Income (ITR) - The appellate tribunal addressed two appeals filed by the assessee against penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2015-16. In the case of the former, the penalty was upheld, despite the appellant&#039;s argument of being a non-resident with limited knowledge of Indian tax laws. However, for the latter assessment year, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing a similar precedent and considering the appellant&#039;s circumstances. The decision emphasized the importance of timely compliance with tax obligations and the relevance of the appellant&#039;s awareness of their tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:47:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Upholds Tax Penalty for 2011-12, Overturns 2015-16 Penalty Citing Precedent and Appellant&#039;s Circumstances.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75832</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure to file the Return of Income (ITR) - The appellate tribunal addressed two appeals filed by the assessee against penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2015-16. In the case of the former, the penalty was upheld, despite the appellant&#039;s argument of being a non-resident with limited knowledge of Indian tax laws. However, for the latter assessment year, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing a similar precedent and considering the appellant&#039;s circumstances. The decision emphasized the importance of timely compliance with tax obligations and the relevance of the appellant&#039;s awareness of their tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:47:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>