<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act constitutionally challenged</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12437</link>
    <description>A constitutional challenge concerns Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, which conditions input tax credit on actual payment of tax by the supplier; the issue arose where the supplier did not reflect the transaction in Form GSTR-3B and the recipient paid tax, and the court restrained coercive recovery during the petition&#039;s pendency subject to a deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:42:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act constitutionally challenged</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12437</link>
      <description>A constitutional challenge concerns Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, which conditions input tax credit on actual payment of tax by the supplier; the issue arose where the supplier did not reflect the transaction in Form GSTR-3B and the recipient paid tax, and the court restrained coercive recovery during the petition&#039;s pendency subject to a deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:42:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>