<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 66 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36198</link>
    <description>Partnership law permits a person to participate in the same firm in separate legal capacities, including individually and as karta representing a Hindu undivided family, where the partnership is genuine, includes other partners, and satisfies registration conditions. The firm is therefore eligible for registration. Profit share received in the representative capacity belongs to and is assessable in the Hindu undivided family&#039;s hands, while the individual share is separately assessable in the person&#039;s individual capacity. Acceptance of separate capital contribution and representative status precludes clubbing the two income streams.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:31:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 66 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36198</link>
      <description>Partnership law permits a person to participate in the same firm in separate legal capacities, including individually and as karta representing a Hindu undivided family, where the partnership is genuine, includes other partners, and satisfies registration conditions. The firm is therefore eligible for registration. Profit share received in the representative capacity belongs to and is assessable in the Hindu undivided family&#039;s hands, while the individual share is separately assessable in the person&#039;s individual capacity. Acceptance of separate capital contribution and representative status precludes clubbing the two income streams.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>