<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds Rule That Pre-Deposits Must Be Made by Appellants, Not Associated Entities.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75829</link>
    <description>Pre-Deposit - Adjustment of various deposits made by entities during the course of investigation - The appellant argued that since they were associated with these entities and deposits were made with No Objection Certificates, these amounts should be adjusted for the pre-deposit requirement. However, the High court upheld the decision of the CESTAT, emphasizing that Section 129E places the responsibility of pre-deposit solely on the appellant, and deposits made by other entities cannot be considered for this purpose. The court&#039;s decision was based on the clear language of the provision, and it found no reason to interfere with the CESTAT&#039;s order. Thus, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:40:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:40:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds Rule That Pre-Deposits Must Be Made by Appellants, Not Associated Entities.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75829</link>
      <description>Pre-Deposit - Adjustment of various deposits made by entities during the course of investigation - The appellant argued that since they were associated with these entities and deposits were made with No Objection Certificates, these amounts should be adjusted for the pre-deposit requirement. However, the High court upheld the decision of the CESTAT, emphasizing that Section 129E places the responsibility of pre-deposit solely on the appellant, and deposits made by other entities cannot be considered for this purpose. The court&#039;s decision was based on the clear language of the provision, and it found no reason to interfere with the CESTAT&#039;s order. Thus, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:40:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>