<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36196</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the set off of unabsorbed depreciation, allowing it to be set off against any income in subsequent years. The issue of forfeited security deposits as trading receipts was not addressed as the assessee did not press for a decision on this matter. No order was made regarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36196</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the set off of unabsorbed depreciation, allowing it to be set off against any income in subsequent years. The issue of forfeited security deposits as trading receipts was not addressed as the assessee did not press for a decision on this matter. No order was made regarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>