<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 55 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36194</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the contribution towards road construction was capital expenditure and disallowed the claim. However, the Tribunal allowed the development rebate claim on new cooling coils, ruling in favor of the assessee. The High Court affirmed these decisions, stating that the road construction expense was not allowable under the Income-tax Act, while the cooling coils qualified for development rebate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 55 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36194</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the contribution towards road construction was capital expenditure and disallowed the claim. However, the Tribunal allowed the development rebate claim on new cooling coils, ruling in favor of the assessee. The High Court affirmed these decisions, stating that the road construction expense was not allowable under the Income-tax Act, while the cooling coils qualified for development rebate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>