<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 798 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, finding the show cause notice unsustainable due to its failure to specify that services were provided after the tax rate change on 18.04.2006. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner&#039;s order for exceeding the notice by demanding additional documentation not initially required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:40:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 798 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, finding the show cause notice unsustainable due to its failure to specify that services were provided after the tax rate change on 18.04.2006. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner&#039;s order for exceeding the notice by demanding additional documentation not initially required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>