<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1374 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313012</link>
    <description>Pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act is mandatory where urgent interim relief is not sought, but substantial compliance was treated as sufficient when the plaintiff genuinely attempted mediation before a recognised court-annexed mediation centre and the respondent did not participate. The absence of mediation before the District Legal Services Authority did not, on these facts, defeat the purpose of Section 12A. The Delhi HC also noted that court-annexed mediation centres are recognised under the Mediation Act, 2023, and that a hyper-technical approach should not override substantial justice where the opposite party remained absent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1374 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313012</link>
      <description>Pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act is mandatory where urgent interim relief is not sought, but substantial compliance was treated as sufficient when the plaintiff genuinely attempted mediation before a recognised court-annexed mediation centre and the respondent did not participate. The absence of mediation before the District Legal Services Authority did not, on these facts, defeat the purpose of Section 12A. The Delhi HC also noted that court-annexed mediation centres are recognised under the Mediation Act, 2023, and that a hyper-technical approach should not override substantial justice where the opposite party remained absent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>