<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1509 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313010</link>
    <description>&quot;Transfer&quot; for the earlier acquisition judgment was interpreted broadly to include not only formal conveyances but also collaboration and development arrangements under which landowners, with knowledge of acquisition proceedings, parted with possession and substantial incidents of ownership in return for consideration or a built-up share. Agreements and licences granted during the suspect period were therefore treated as falling within the mischief of the earlier judgment. The note also explains that the widened meaning was applied project-wise: some lands and projects were brought within the deemed award, while others were excluded where no disqualifying transfer was shown, with protective reliefs described for completed interests, allottees, refunds, and residual development rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1509 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313010</link>
      <description>&quot;Transfer&quot; for the earlier acquisition judgment was interpreted broadly to include not only formal conveyances but also collaboration and development arrangements under which landowners, with knowledge of acquisition proceedings, parted with possession and substantial incidents of ownership in return for consideration or a built-up share. Agreements and licences granted during the suspect period were therefore treated as falling within the mischief of the earlier judgment. The note also explains that the widened meaning was applied project-wise: some lands and projects were brought within the deemed award, while others were excluded where no disqualifying transfer was shown, with protective reliefs described for completed interests, allottees, refunds, and residual development rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>