<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 2006 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313008</link>
    <description>The SC held that consumer forums under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 cannot award interest and compensation arbitrarily using rule of thumb methods. Where parties agreed to damages at Rs. 10/- per sq. ft. per month for delayed possession, exceptional reasons are required to award compensation exceeding the agreed rate. The NCDRC&#039;s order granting compensation under multiple heads without proper foundation was unsustainable. While complainants were entitled to interest for delayed possession, special punitive damages were not warranted as some delays were beyond the appellant&#039;s control. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 2006 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313008</link>
      <description>The SC held that consumer forums under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 cannot award interest and compensation arbitrarily using rule of thumb methods. Where parties agreed to damages at Rs. 10/- per sq. ft. per month for delayed possession, exceptional reasons are required to award compensation exceeding the agreed rate. The NCDRC&#039;s order granting compensation under multiple heads without proper foundation was unsustainable. While complainants were entitled to interest for delayed possession, special punitive damages were not warranted as some delays were beyond the appellant&#039;s control. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>