<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1358 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313005</link>
    <description>In an NDPS bail matter, the Court declined to entertain the petitioner&#039;s request because the co-accused, although on bail, had not surrendered. The petitioner had remained in custody since 16.06.2020, but the Court did not grant relief on that basis and instead directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings without waiting for the absconding co-accused. No bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1358 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313005</link>
      <description>In an NDPS bail matter, the Court declined to entertain the petitioner&#039;s request because the co-accused, although on bail, had not surrendered. The petitioner had remained in custody since 16.06.2020, but the Court did not grant relief on that basis and instead directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings without waiting for the absconding co-accused. No bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>