<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1233 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313003</link>
    <description>On a demurrer under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, territorial jurisdiction is assessed on the plaint averments and accompanying documents, not on disputed evidence; because the plaint alleged clandestine sales, online solicitation, advertisements in Delhi, and business activity within the forum, return of the plaint for want of territorial jurisdiction was unsustainable. Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act applies only where the suit does not contemplate urgent interim relief; since the plaint itself sought urgent interim relief, rejection for non-compliance with Section 12A was not warranted. The appeal was allowed, the cross-objection failed, and the suit was permitted to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1233 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313003</link>
      <description>On a demurrer under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, territorial jurisdiction is assessed on the plaint averments and accompanying documents, not on disputed evidence; because the plaint alleged clandestine sales, online solicitation, advertisements in Delhi, and business activity within the forum, return of the plaint for want of territorial jurisdiction was unsustainable. Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act applies only where the suit does not contemplate urgent interim relief; since the plaint itself sought urgent interim relief, rejection for non-compliance with Section 12A was not warranted. The appeal was allowed, the cross-objection failed, and the suit was permitted to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>