https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313002 A quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC was rejected because the complaint and supporting materials contained allegations linking the petitioner, a director, to the transaction. Her claim that she was not responsible for the company's day-to-day affairs raised a factual defence that could not be decided at the quashing stage. The Court applied the settled principle that disputed questions of fact and defence material are ordinarily left for trial, and the accused may raise those contentions before the trial court. The criminal proceedings were therefore permitted to continue. en-us Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:39:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313002 A quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC was rejected because the complaint and supporting materials contained allegations linking the petitioner, a director, to the transaction. Her claim that she was not responsible for the company's day-to-day affairs raised a factual defence that could not be decided at the quashing stage. The Court applied the settled principle that disputed questions of fact and defence material are ordinarily left for trial, and the accused may raise those contentions before the trial court. The criminal proceedings were therefore permitted to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313002