<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 636 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312993</link>
    <description>A notification issued under section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act may validly amend an existing exemption, because the power to grant exemption includes the power to vary or rescind it. The instrument was treated as a conveyance within the charging scheme, and the burden of stamp duty fell on the grantee under section 29 and the contract terms; the proviso to section 3(bb) did not shift liability to the State. The five-thousand-rupee ceiling in item No. 11 of the amended exemption was read as governing the whole entry, including the general category of forest-produce conveyances, so instruments above that limit lost exemption and remained liable to stamp duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:07:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 636 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312993</link>
      <description>A notification issued under section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act may validly amend an existing exemption, because the power to grant exemption includes the power to vary or rescind it. The instrument was treated as a conveyance within the charging scheme, and the burden of stamp duty fell on the grantee under section 29 and the contract terms; the proviso to section 3(bb) did not shift liability to the State. The five-thousand-rupee ceiling in item No. 11 of the amended exemption was read as governing the whole entry, including the general category of forest-produce conveyances, so instruments above that limit lost exemption and remained liable to stamp duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>