<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 610 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312990</link>
    <description>A prohibition on contract labour under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 is valid only if the appropriate Government considers the Section 10(2) factors-conditions of work, benefits and the other relevant criteria-with reference to the particular establishment or a legally identifiable group of establishments. An omnibus notification that abolishes contract labour across canteens or similar units without establishment-wise application of mind is contrary to the statutory scheme and is invalid. The impugned Government Orders were therefore quashed for non-compliance with Section 10(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:57:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 610 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312990</link>
      <description>A prohibition on contract labour under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 is valid only if the appropriate Government considers the Section 10(2) factors-conditions of work, benefits and the other relevant criteria-with reference to the particular establishment or a legally identifiable group of establishments. An omnibus notification that abolishes contract labour across canteens or similar units without establishment-wise application of mind is contrary to the statutory scheme and is invalid. The impugned Government Orders were therefore quashed for non-compliance with Section 10(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>