<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Confirms Power to Condonate Delays in Appeals Against Acquittals, Upholds Supreme Court Judgment&#039;s Binding Nature.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75796</link>
    <description>High court power / jurisdiction to condone the delay - delay in filing an application seeking special leave to appeal against an acquittal. - After thorough consideration, the High court concluded that there is indeed power to condone the delay in such cases. - The court emphasized the precedential authority of a Supreme Court judgment, stating that it is binding on all courts unless distinguished, overruled, or set aside. The argument that the Supreme Court decision was inadequately considered was rejected. - The court analyzed the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Limitation Act, particularly regarding their applicability in appeals against acquittal. It concluded that Section 5 of the Limitation Act can be availed in such appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:56:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Confirms Power to Condonate Delays in Appeals Against Acquittals, Upholds Supreme Court Judgment&#039;s Binding Nature.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75796</link>
      <description>High court power / jurisdiction to condone the delay - delay in filing an application seeking special leave to appeal against an acquittal. - After thorough consideration, the High court concluded that there is indeed power to condone the delay in such cases. - The court emphasized the precedential authority of a Supreme Court judgment, stating that it is binding on all courts unless distinguished, overruled, or set aside. The argument that the Supreme Court decision was inadequately considered was rejected. - The court analyzed the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Limitation Act, particularly regarding their applicability in appeals against acquittal. It concluded that Section 5 of the Limitation Act can be availed in such appeals.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:56:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>