https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450993 An application for condonation of delay in seeking special leave to appeal against an acquittal under Section 378 CrPC is maintainable because Section 378 does not contain any express exclusion of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The later Supreme Court ruling was treated as binding, and earlier decisions under different statutory settings, including the old Code and old Limitation Act, were held not to displace that position. Arguments that the later ruling was incomplete or ineffective were rejected, so the delay may be considered under the Limitation Act. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450993 An application for condonation of delay in seeking special leave to appeal against an acquittal under Section 378 CrPC is maintainable because Section 378 does not contain any express exclusion of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The later Supreme Court ruling was treated as binding, and earlier decisions under different statutory settings, including the old Code and old Limitation Act, were held not to displace that position. Arguments that the later ruling was incomplete or ineffective were rejected, so the delay may be considered under the Limitation Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450993