<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 774 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450993</link>
    <description>Bombay HC held that it has jurisdiction to condone delay in filing applications for leave to appeal against acquittal under the Code of 1973. Following SC precedent in Mohd. Abaad Ali case, the court disposed of the reference by ruling that the Department&#039;s application for condonation of delay in seeking special leave to appeal against acquittal is maintainable. The questions previously framed by the Single Judge were answered by the binding SC decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 774 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450993</link>
      <description>Bombay HC held that it has jurisdiction to condone delay in filing applications for leave to appeal against acquittal under the Code of 1973. Following SC precedent in Mohd. Abaad Ali case, the court disposed of the reference by ruling that the Department&#039;s application for condonation of delay in seeking special leave to appeal against acquittal is maintainable. The questions previously framed by the Single Judge were answered by the binding SC decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>