<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 769 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450988</link>
    <description>Under the India-Singapore DTAA, service permanent establishment requires actual furnishing of services in India through physical presence within the treaty threshold; as no fixed place or qualifying presence was shown, and the treaty did not recognise a virtual service permanent establishment, the receipts were not taxable in India as business profits. Interest under section 234B was not leviable because the relevant income was subject to deduction at source. Additions based only on Form 26AS entries for alleged bank receipts and refund interest could not be sustained without proof of actual receipt, so verification by the Assessing Officer was required before any fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 769 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450988</link>
      <description>Under the India-Singapore DTAA, service permanent establishment requires actual furnishing of services in India through physical presence within the treaty threshold; as no fixed place or qualifying presence was shown, and the treaty did not recognise a virtual service permanent establishment, the receipts were not taxable in India as business profits. Interest under section 234B was not leviable because the relevant income was subject to deduction at source. Additions based only on Form 26AS entries for alleged bank receipts and refund interest could not be sustained without proof of actual receipt, so verification by the Assessing Officer was required before any fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>