https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450982 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant, the vehicle owner. Although there was insufficient direct evidence linking the owner to smuggling activities, the Tribunal acknowledged the owner's responsibility for the driver's actions. Relief was granted considering the appellant's financial condition and the factual circumstances surrounding the use of the vehicle for transporting seized goods. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450982 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant, the vehicle owner. Although there was insufficient direct evidence linking the owner to smuggling activities, the Tribunal acknowledged the owner's responsibility for the driver's actions. Relief was granted considering the appellant's financial condition and the factual circumstances surrounding the use of the vehicle for transporting seized goods. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450982