<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 759 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450978</link>
    <description>The SC declined to interfere with the impugned order in PMLA-related Special Leave Petitions and dismissed them. It also recorded that if the acquittal of the accused in the predicate offence is later overturned, the Directorate of Enforcement may apply for revival of the Special Leave Petitions. The order thus preserves a limited liberty to seek revival on a future change in the predicate-offence outcome, while leaving the present dismissal in place.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:52:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 759 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450978</link>
      <description>The SC declined to interfere with the impugned order in PMLA-related Special Leave Petitions and dismissed them. It also recorded that if the acquittal of the accused in the predicate offence is later overturned, the Directorate of Enforcement may apply for revival of the Special Leave Petitions. The order thus preserves a limited liberty to seek revival on a future change in the predicate-offence outcome, while leaving the present dismissal in place.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>