<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 752 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450971</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant. It concluded that Rule 4(5)(a) of the CCR, 2004, was inapplicable as it pertains to raw or partially processed materials, not finished goods. The demand for reversal of Cenvat credit, along with interest and penalties, was overturned. The ground of limitation remains open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 752 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450971</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant. It concluded that Rule 4(5)(a) of the CCR, 2004, was inapplicable as it pertains to raw or partially processed materials, not finished goods. The demand for reversal of Cenvat credit, along with interest and penalties, was overturned. The ground of limitation remains open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>