<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 750 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450969</link>
    <description>Appellate interference with an ex parte ad interim injunction in a defamation suit is confined to cases where the order is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles governing temporary injunctions. The court stressed that discretion should not be substituted merely because the injunction was granted ex parte at an early stage, especially where the order reflected consideration of reputational harm, alleged business impact, the absence of SEBI findings, and prima facie satisfaction of the triple test. The availability of ordinary trial-court remedies, including reply and modification, was also relevant. On that basis, the injunction order was left undisturbed and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2024 06:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 750 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450969</link>
      <description>Appellate interference with an ex parte ad interim injunction in a defamation suit is confined to cases where the order is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles governing temporary injunctions. The court stressed that discretion should not be substituted merely because the injunction was granted ex parte at an early stage, especially where the order reflected consideration of reputational harm, alleged business impact, the absence of SEBI findings, and prima facie satisfaction of the triple test. The availability of ordinary trial-court remedies, including reply and modification, was also relevant. On that basis, the injunction order was left undisturbed and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>