<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1463 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312972</link>
    <description>In NDPS prosecutions involving commercial quantity, the prosecution defeats default bail only by seeking extension of time under Section 36A(4) before expiry of the statutory period. A police report under Section 173(2) CrPC is complete only when it complies with statutory requirements and includes the documents required under Section 173(5). Where the chemical examiner&#039;s report is necessary to determine whether the alleged contraband attracts the NDPS Act, filing a challan without that report does not constitute a complete report capable of defeating the accused&#039;s right to default bail under Section 167(2). The accused was therefore held to have acquired an indefeasible right to default bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1463 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312972</link>
      <description>In NDPS prosecutions involving commercial quantity, the prosecution defeats default bail only by seeking extension of time under Section 36A(4) before expiry of the statutory period. A police report under Section 173(2) CrPC is complete only when it complies with statutory requirements and includes the documents required under Section 173(5). Where the chemical examiner&#039;s report is necessary to determine whether the alleged contraband attracts the NDPS Act, filing a challan without that report does not constitute a complete report capable of defeating the accused&#039;s right to default bail under Section 167(2). The accused was therefore held to have acquired an indefeasible right to default bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>