<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1364 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312971</link>
    <description>Interference with refusal to condone delay was declined where the appellate court had assessed the surrounding facts, including the parties&#039; prior litigation, and found the explanation for delay unacceptable. The High Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration, so the dismissal of the appeal and the refusal to condone delay were left undisturbed. The challenge to the appellate court&#039;s order therefore failed, and the matter stood finally disposed of against the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1364 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312971</link>
      <description>Interference with refusal to condone delay was declined where the appellate court had assessed the surrounding facts, including the parties&#039; prior litigation, and found the explanation for delay unacceptable. The High Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration, so the dismissal of the appeal and the refusal to condone delay were left undisturbed. The challenge to the appellate court&#039;s order therefore failed, and the matter stood finally disposed of against the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>