https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312970 In an NDPS prosecution involving alleged commercial quantity, the right to default bail under Section 167(2) remained enforceable when the final report was not filed within the permissible period and the statutory extension requirements were not properly met. The special extension beyond 180 days under Section 36A(4) depended on a Public Prosecutor's report showing investigation progress, specific detention reasons, and notice to the accused. Because the extension application was routine, the notice was not served, and the factual basis was inadequate, the extension order was set aside and bail was granted. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:40:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312970 In an NDPS prosecution involving alleged commercial quantity, the right to default bail under Section 167(2) remained enforceable when the final report was not filed within the permissible period and the statutory extension requirements were not properly met. The special extension beyond 180 days under Section 36A(4) depended on a Public Prosecutor's report showing investigation progress, specific detention reasons, and notice to the accused. Because the extension application was routine, the notice was not served, and the factual basis was inadequate, the extension order was set aside and bail was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312970