<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 711 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. The disallowance of the addition for the alleged delay in depositing employees&#039; contributions to P.F. and ESI was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification. The disallowance of the deduction under section 80 JJAA was ordered to be deleted, as the Tribunal found no statutory basis for such disallowance under section 143(1) for the relevant assessment year. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 07:50:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 711 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. The disallowance of the addition for the alleged delay in depositing employees&#039; contributions to P.F. and ESI was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification. The disallowance of the deduction under section 80 JJAA was ordered to be deleted, as the Tribunal found no statutory basis for such disallowance under section 143(1) for the relevant assessment year. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>