<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 697 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450916</link>
    <description>Allegations of direct participation by company directors in inducement, receipt of funds, and alleged misuse were sufficient to resist quashing, because the absence of general vicarious criminal liability did not help where personal roles were pleaded and the company was named in the FIR. Appointment of a provisional liquidator did not bar initiation or continuation of criminal proceedings, as criminal law operates independently of company-law supervision. The dispute was also not treated as purely civil, since the FIR and supporting material disclosed cheating, dishonest inducement, and misappropriation. Disputed questions of fact could not be resolved in Section 482 proceedings, so the prosecution was left to proceed to trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 06:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 697 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450916</link>
      <description>Allegations of direct participation by company directors in inducement, receipt of funds, and alleged misuse were sufficient to resist quashing, because the absence of general vicarious criminal liability did not help where personal roles were pleaded and the company was named in the FIR. Appointment of a provisional liquidator did not bar initiation or continuation of criminal proceedings, as criminal law operates independently of company-law supervision. The dispute was also not treated as purely civil, since the FIR and supporting material disclosed cheating, dishonest inducement, and misappropriation. Disputed questions of fact could not be resolved in Section 482 proceedings, so the prosecution was left to proceed to trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>