https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450914 Interim protection in a money-laundering inquiry was declined because the ED's summons power under the PMLA is aimed at collecting information and evidence on proceeds of crime, and the summons could not be quashed merely for not listing the required documents. Earlier insolvency-related orders and anticipatory bail in the predicate case did not, at that stage, show that the petitioner was unconnected with proceeds of crime or deprive the ED of investigative jurisdiction. The petitioner had not been absolved of the scheduled offence, and the Court refused to grant protective relief through inherent jurisdiction in a manner equivalent to anticipatory bail. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Mar 2024 07:49:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450914 Interim protection in a money-laundering inquiry was declined because the ED's summons power under the PMLA is aimed at collecting information and evidence on proceeds of crime, and the summons could not be quashed merely for not listing the required documents. Earlier insolvency-related orders and anticipatory bail in the predicate case did not, at that stage, show that the petitioner was unconnected with proceeds of crime or deprive the ED of investigative jurisdiction. The petitioner had not been absolved of the scheduled offence, and the Court refused to grant protective relief through inherent jurisdiction in a manner equivalent to anticipatory bail. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450914