<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 694 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalty, directing a reevaluation of the appellant&#039;s tax liability. It emphasized the necessity to consider the appellant&#039;s entitlement to threshold exemption and abatement, as well as sales on which VAT was paid. The appeal was remanded for fresh adjudication, instructing the lower authority to incorporate the appellant&#039;s evidence presented during the Tribunal hearing. The Tribunal found the initial demand unsustainable due to reliance on third-party data without independent corroboration. The appellant&#039;s lack of response to the show cause notice and absence at the personal hearing were noted but did not preclude the need for a fair reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 07:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 694 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalty, directing a reevaluation of the appellant&#039;s tax liability. It emphasized the necessity to consider the appellant&#039;s entitlement to threshold exemption and abatement, as well as sales on which VAT was paid. The appeal was remanded for fresh adjudication, instructing the lower authority to incorporate the appellant&#039;s evidence presented during the Tribunal hearing. The Tribunal found the initial demand unsustainable due to reliance on third-party data without independent corroboration. The appellant&#039;s lack of response to the show cause notice and absence at the personal hearing were noted but did not preclude the need for a fair reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>