https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36166 The court held that the notices were validly served within the limitation period, the service by affixation was lawful, and there was sufficient material for the ITO and WTO to believe that income/wealth had escaped assessment. The petitions were dismissed with costs, as none of the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners were found to have merit. en-us Mon, 30 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:57:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36166 The court held that the notices were validly served within the limitation period, the service by affixation was lawful, and there was sufficient material for the ITO and WTO to believe that income/wealth had escaped assessment. The petitions were dismissed with costs, as none of the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners were found to have merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 30 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36166