<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 834 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312960</link>
    <description>A successive regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in an NDPS prosecution will not be entertained where an earlier bail plea has already been decided on merits and no changed circumstances are shown. On the facts stated, the prior detailed order covered the matter, the record disclosed no new ground for reconsideration, and the renewed request was rejected as not made out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 834 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312960</link>
      <description>A successive regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in an NDPS prosecution will not be entertained where an earlier bail plea has already been decided on merits and no changed circumstances are shown. On the facts stated, the prior detailed order covered the matter, the record disclosed no new ground for reconsideration, and the renewed request was rejected as not made out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>