<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1947 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found no deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the Assessee regarding the non-disclosure of technical service fees from M/s. Crisil Ltd. The Tribunal emphasized the Assessee&#039;s prompt acceptance of the income addition and the inadvertent nature of the non-disclosure, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1947 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found no deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the Assessee regarding the non-disclosure of technical service fees from M/s. Crisil Ltd. The Tribunal emphasized the Assessee&#039;s prompt acceptance of the income addition and the inadvertent nature of the non-disclosure, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>