<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1540 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312953</link>
    <description>Where FIR and charge-sheet do not disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offences, criminal proceedings may be quashed as an abuse of process. The SC noted that a property dispute with parallel civil proceedings, without material showing the purchaser&#039;s involvement in forgery or fabrication, and with a vague investigation that did not establish what was found against him, could not support cheating, forgery or related charges. A mere assertion of fraud or a title dispute is insufficient unless the statutory elements are specifically made out. The proceedings against the appellant were quashed, and the connected appeal was also allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1540 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312953</link>
      <description>Where FIR and charge-sheet do not disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offences, criminal proceedings may be quashed as an abuse of process. The SC noted that a property dispute with parallel civil proceedings, without material showing the purchaser&#039;s involvement in forgery or fabrication, and with a vague investigation that did not establish what was found against him, could not support cheating, forgery or related charges. A mere assertion of fraud or a title dispute is insufficient unless the statutory elements are specifically made out. The proceedings against the appellant were quashed, and the connected appeal was also allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>