https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312951 Anticipatory bail was considered for applicants facing prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, with the Court applying the statutory requirements under Section 438 CrPC and Section 45 PMLA, including notice to the Public Prosecutor, reasonable grounds for bail, and satisfaction that the accused would not repeat the offence. The Court also noted that similarly placed accused persons had already obtained protection from the Supreme Court and treated the applicants as standing on the same footing. On that basis, the applicants were held entitled to anticipatory bail, with release on bail in the event of arrest subject to terms fixed by the trial Court and the requirement to seek regular bail before the competent Court. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:15:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312951 Anticipatory bail was considered for applicants facing prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, with the Court applying the statutory requirements under Section 438 CrPC and Section 45 PMLA, including notice to the Public Prosecutor, reasonable grounds for bail, and satisfaction that the accused would not repeat the offence. The Court also noted that similarly placed accused persons had already obtained protection from the Supreme Court and treated the applicants as standing on the same footing. On that basis, the applicants were held entitled to anticipatory bail, with release on bail in the event of arrest subject to terms fixed by the trial Court and the requirement to seek regular bail before the competent Court. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312951