https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312949 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was refused where the allegations disclosed a serious case of illegal detention and elimination, further material had emerged during investigation, and a graver offence was later added. The Court held that an earlier Supreme Court order did not bar fresh proceedings where permitted by law, and that anticipatory bail does not limit investigation or exclude custodial interrogation when the facts are grave and evidence must be secured. Delay in prosecution was not treated as decisive, as lapse of time alone does not defeat serious criminal proceedings. The petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:15:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312949 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was refused where the allegations disclosed a serious case of illegal detention and elimination, further material had emerged during investigation, and a graver offence was later added. The Court held that an earlier Supreme Court order did not bar fresh proceedings where permitted by law, and that anticipatory bail does not limit investigation or exclude custodial interrogation when the facts are grave and evidence must be secured. Delay in prosecution was not treated as decisive, as lapse of time alone does not defeat serious criminal proceedings. The petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312949