<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 684 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450903</link>
    <description>A Special Leave Petition was filed with a 167-day delay, and the explanation offered for condonation was found insufficient. The Supreme Court therefore declined to entertain the petition and dismissed it on the ground of delay. The order turns entirely on the failure to justify the delayed filing, with no examination of the substantive dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 684 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450903</link>
      <description>A Special Leave Petition was filed with a 167-day delay, and the explanation offered for condonation was found insufficient. The Supreme Court therefore declined to entertain the petition and dismissed it on the ground of delay. The order turns entirely on the failure to justify the delayed filing, with no examination of the substantive dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>