<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 677 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450896</link>
    <description>HC addressed the non-constitution of Appellate Tribunal under CGST and OGST Acts, which impacted statutory appeal remedies. The court directed extension of tax deposit stay benefits to petitioner, subject to conditions. Petitioner must file appeal under Section 112 once Tribunal is constituted, or authorities can proceed further. Writ petition was disposed of with specific directions addressing procedural challenges in GST legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 677 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450896</link>
      <description>HC addressed the non-constitution of Appellate Tribunal under CGST and OGST Acts, which impacted statutory appeal remedies. The court directed extension of tax deposit stay benefits to petitioner, subject to conditions. Petitioner must file appeal under Section 112 once Tribunal is constituted, or authorities can proceed further. Writ petition was disposed of with specific directions addressing procedural challenges in GST legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>