<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 640 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450859</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications in service tax law must be construed strictly, and works undertaken for a shipyard do not qualify as construction of a port unless they squarely fall within the notified structures and conditions. Development of shipyard facilities, including land development, marine infrastructure, workshop construction and related works, was held outside the port-construction exemption and therefore taxable. Dredging services for the approach channel, repair berth and floating dry dock were treated as part of the same shipyard development arrangement and likewise remained taxable. Since tax had been collected without disclosure or payment, the extended limitation period and consequential penalties were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 640 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450859</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications in service tax law must be construed strictly, and works undertaken for a shipyard do not qualify as construction of a port unless they squarely fall within the notified structures and conditions. Development of shipyard facilities, including land development, marine infrastructure, workshop construction and related works, was held outside the port-construction exemption and therefore taxable. Dredging services for the approach channel, repair berth and floating dry dock were treated as part of the same shipyard development arrangement and likewise remained taxable. Since tax had been collected without disclosure or payment, the extended limitation period and consequential penalties were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>