<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 634 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to 25% of the amount involved, acknowledging that the appellant had reversed the inadmissible CENVAT Credit along with interest. The Tribunal differentiated this case from others involving denied CENVAT Credit, ultimately deciding the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 634 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to 25% of the amount involved, acknowledging that the appellant had reversed the inadmissible CENVAT Credit along with interest. The Tribunal differentiated this case from others involving denied CENVAT Credit, ultimately deciding the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>