https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312942 The HC allowed the petitioner's request for a Writ of Certiorari, quashing the impugned order, and granted a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's application for tax exemption on land acquisition compensation. The Court found the respondent's rejection of the refund request and delay condonation to be erroneous and contrary to the evidence. The HC ordered the respondent to refund the tax collected to the petitioner within one month, emphasizing the validity of the petitioner's reasons for delay and the exemption of land acquisition compensation from income tax. en-us Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:54:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312942 The HC allowed the petitioner's request for a Writ of Certiorari, quashing the impugned order, and granted a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's application for tax exemption on land acquisition compensation. The Court found the respondent's rejection of the refund request and delay condonation to be erroneous and contrary to the evidence. The HC ordered the respondent to refund the tax collected to the petitioner within one month, emphasizing the validity of the petitioner's reasons for delay and the exemption of land acquisition compensation from income tax. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312942