https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312940 Criminal liability for cheating under Section 420 IPC requires a specific allegation that the accused dishonestly induced the complainant to deliver property. Where the FIR and complaint attributed misrepresentation and inducement only to the co-accused husband, and no role was alleged against the appellant in causing delivery of the gold jewellery, the prosecution against her could not be sustained. The proceedings against the appellant were quashed, and the High Court's refusal to do so was set aside to that extent. en-us Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:53:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312940 Criminal liability for cheating under Section 420 IPC requires a specific allegation that the accused dishonestly induced the complainant to deliver property. Where the FIR and complaint attributed misrepresentation and inducement only to the co-accused husband, and no role was alleged against the appellant in causing delivery of the gold jewellery, the prosecution against her could not be sustained. The proceedings against the appellant were quashed, and the High Court's refusal to do so was set aside to that extent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312940