https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312938 The Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 operates as a self-contained code for planned development, so the time-limit and lapsing consequence in Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 cannot be imported into acquisitions under the State Act. The statutory time structure and default consequences must be found within the BDA Act itself. Delay in issuing the final notification was also held not to justify quashing the preliminary notification under Section 17, particularly where the delay arose in the context of objections, proposed exclusions and governmental scrutiny. The High Court's contrary approach was set aside, and the scheme and preliminary notification were upheld. en-us Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:53:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312938 The Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 operates as a self-contained code for planned development, so the time-limit and lapsing consequence in Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 cannot be imported into acquisitions under the State Act. The statutory time structure and default consequences must be found within the BDA Act itself. Delay in issuing the final notification was also held not to justify quashing the preliminary notification under Section 17, particularly where the delay arose in the context of objections, proposed exclusions and governmental scrutiny. The High Court's contrary approach was set aside, and the scheme and preliminary notification were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312938