https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312937 In exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC and supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, the High Court cannot conduct a mini-trial or reassess the probative value of evidence at the quashing stage. Where cognizance has been taken and process issued after examination of witnesses, interference is limited to testing whether the proceedings disclose a legal basis, not weighing sufficiency or credibility of material. By virtually retrying the complaint and evaluating evidence, the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction. The order was unsustainable, and the complaint proceedings were directed to continue from the stage at which they had been interrupted. en-us Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:53:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312937 In exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC and supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, the High Court cannot conduct a mini-trial or reassess the probative value of evidence at the quashing stage. Where cognizance has been taken and process issued after examination of witnesses, interference is limited to testing whether the proceedings disclose a legal basis, not weighing sufficiency or credibility of material. By virtually retrying the complaint and evaluating evidence, the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction. The order was unsustainable, and the complaint proceedings were directed to continue from the stage at which they had been interrupted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312937