<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1465 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312932</link>
    <description>The HC condoned a 474-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite an NCLT order and Section 14 of the Insolvency &amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which imposed a moratorium. The appeal was dismissed due to the NCLT order&#039;s impact, leaving substantial legal questions open for future consideration. The stay application was also dismissed, reflecting the statutory limitations on the revenue&#039;s ability to pursue the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1465 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312932</link>
      <description>The HC condoned a 474-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite an NCLT order and Section 14 of the Insolvency &amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which imposed a moratorium. The appeal was dismissed due to the NCLT order&#039;s impact, leaving substantial legal questions open for future consideration. The stay application was also dismissed, reflecting the statutory limitations on the revenue&#039;s ability to pursue the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>