https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312928 Regular bail was granted in a demonetisation-related conspiracy case where the allegations were largely documentary and centred on fund transfers through the petitioner's firms. The Court found that the core transactions originated with other accused, while the petitioner's role was limited to later transfers and possible limited monetary benefit. It also noted that the investigation as to the petitioner was complete, no further recovery was required, the material was not likely to be tampered with, and the main accused and some co-accused had not been arrested or had already obtained bail. Continued custody was therefore held unnecessary, subject to conditions. en-us Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:53:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312928 Regular bail was granted in a demonetisation-related conspiracy case where the allegations were largely documentary and centred on fund transfers through the petitioner's firms. The Court found that the core transactions originated with other accused, while the petitioner's role was limited to later transfers and possible limited monetary benefit. It also noted that the investigation as to the petitioner was complete, no further recovery was required, the material was not likely to be tampered with, and the main accused and some co-accused had not been arrested or had already obtained bail. Continued custody was therefore held unnecessary, subject to conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312928