<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1333 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312918</link>
    <description>Successive declarations under Section 28(4) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 may be issued for individual parcels after consideration of objections under Section 28(3). This procedure differs from the collective acquisition process under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, so the requirement of a single composite declaration does not apply. Delay in issuing a final notification or making an award does not by itself invalidate acquisition; its reasonableness depends on the statutory scheme, factual circumstances, and legally relevant prejudice. Where former landowners sold the property after preliminary notification and suffered no compensation-related prejudice, delay does not cause acquisition to lapse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 12:10:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1333 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312918</link>
      <description>Successive declarations under Section 28(4) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 may be issued for individual parcels after consideration of objections under Section 28(3). This procedure differs from the collective acquisition process under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, so the requirement of a single composite declaration does not apply. Delay in issuing a final notification or making an award does not by itself invalidate acquisition; its reasonableness depends on the statutory scheme, factual circumstances, and legally relevant prejudice. Where former landowners sold the property after preliminary notification and suffered no compensation-related prejudice, delay does not cause acquisition to lapse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>