https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312918 Under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, successive declarations under Section 28(4) are permissible because the Act permits the Government to consider objections and issue declarations in respect of individual lands; the scheme is not treated as identical to the unamended Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The article also states that delay in issuing the final notification or passing the award does not by itself vitiate acquisition: reasonableness depends on the statutory scheme and facts, and the challenge weakens where the landowners had sold the property long before the later stages and could not show legally relevant prejudice. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Mar 2024 12:10:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312918 Under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, successive declarations under Section 28(4) are permissible because the Act permits the Government to consider objections and issue declarations in respect of individual lands; the scheme is not treated as identical to the unamended Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The article also states that delay in issuing the final notification or passing the award does not by itself vitiate acquisition: reasonableness depends on the statutory scheme and facts, and the challenge weakens where the landowners had sold the property long before the later stages and could not show legally relevant prejudice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312918