<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 613 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450832</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai ruled on multiple issues for a bank assessee. CSR expenses were disallowed as Explanation (2) to section 37 restricts deduction of CSR expenditure from AY 2015-16. ESOS expenses were allowed as deductible under section 37(1) following precedent that difference between market price and exercise price is revenue expenditure. Depreciation on investments was allowed per market price valuation. Interest disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was remanded for verification of exempt status of recipients. QIP expenses issue was remanded to verify business extension claims. Bad debt provisions and write-offs were clarified - non-rural debt write-offs need not be adjusted against rural debt provisions. Section 36(1)(viia) deduction computation was corrected to consider aggregate average advances. Section 14A addition was deleted as no expenditure was incurred for exempt income. Excess cash, stale drafts additions were deleted following HC precedent. ATM depreciation at 60% was upheld. NPA interest additions were deleted as interest doesn&#039;t accrue on non-performing assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 613 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450832</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai ruled on multiple issues for a bank assessee. CSR expenses were disallowed as Explanation (2) to section 37 restricts deduction of CSR expenditure from AY 2015-16. ESOS expenses were allowed as deductible under section 37(1) following precedent that difference between market price and exercise price is revenue expenditure. Depreciation on investments was allowed per market price valuation. Interest disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was remanded for verification of exempt status of recipients. QIP expenses issue was remanded to verify business extension claims. Bad debt provisions and write-offs were clarified - non-rural debt write-offs need not be adjusted against rural debt provisions. Section 36(1)(viia) deduction computation was corrected to consider aggregate average advances. Section 14A addition was deleted as no expenditure was incurred for exempt income. Excess cash, stale drafts additions were deleted following HC precedent. ATM depreciation at 60% was upheld. NPA interest additions were deleted as interest doesn&#039;t accrue on non-performing assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>