<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 603 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450822</link>
    <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Customs could not be denied for want of a cost structure certificate where the notification did not require such a document. The importer had produced a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate stating that the duty burden was not passed on, along with evidence of VAT/Sales Tax payment. The authority could examine only whether the incidence of SAD had been passed on and whether the prescribed supporting evidence was furnished; it could not add an extra-statutory condition. Rejection of refund on the ground of non-production of cost structure was therefore unsustainable, and refund was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:43:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 603 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450822</link>
      <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Customs could not be denied for want of a cost structure certificate where the notification did not require such a document. The importer had produced a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate stating that the duty burden was not passed on, along with evidence of VAT/Sales Tax payment. The authority could examine only whether the incidence of SAD had been passed on and whether the prescribed supporting evidence was furnished; it could not add an extra-statutory condition. Rejection of refund on the ground of non-production of cost structure was therefore unsustainable, and refund was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>