https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75679 Undervalued/preferential/fraudulent transactions - Failure to adjudicate about the ingredients of Section 43, 45, 49 and 66, specifically - need for separate consideration of preferential, undervalued, and fraudulent transactions, each requiring distinct scrutiny and evidence - NCLAT found that the Adjudicating Authority's order lacked sufficient scrutiny and analysis. The Court observed that the Authority merely recorded its conclusions without adequately considering the individual nature of each transaction and without referencing the pleadings or materials on record. Specifically, the Tribunal noted that the Authority's conclusion of fraudulent transactions lacked detailed reasoning and examination of the ingredients required to establish fraud. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:42:57 +0530 Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:42:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75679 Undervalued/preferential/fraudulent transactions - Failure to adjudicate about the ingredients of Section 43, 45, 49 and 66, specifically - need for separate consideration of preferential, undervalued, and fraudulent transactions, each requiring distinct scrutiny and evidence - NCLAT found that the Adjudicating Authority's order lacked sufficient scrutiny and analysis. The Court observed that the Authority merely recorded its conclusions without adequately considering the individual nature of each transaction and without referencing the pleadings or materials on record. Specifically, the Tribunal noted that the Authority's conclusion of fraudulent transactions lacked detailed reasoning and examination of the ingredients required to establish fraud. Highlights Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:42:57 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75679