https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450808 Adjournment in appellate proceedings was restricted by the governing provision to not more than three occasions on sufficient cause, so repeated requests beyond that statutory ceiling were not justified. The Tribunal also applied its procedure rule on absence of the appellant and held that, where the appeal was not effectively prosecuted despite multiple listings and opportunities, it could be dismissed for default. On the facts, further indulgence was declined and the appeal was terminated for want of prosecution. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:42:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450808 Adjournment in appellate proceedings was restricted by the governing provision to not more than three occasions on sufficient cause, so repeated requests beyond that statutory ceiling were not justified. The Tribunal also applied its procedure rule on absence of the appellant and held that, where the appeal was not effectively prosecuted despite multiple listings and opportunities, it could be dismissed for default. On the facts, further indulgence was declined and the appeal was terminated for want of prosecution. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450808